toggle visibility Search & Display Options

Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print
  Record Links
Author (up) El-Sayed Ahmad, A.; Bayram, A.; Salamate, S.; Sirat, S.; Amer, M.; Bakhtiary, F. url  doi
openurl 
  Title Percutaneous versus surgical femoral access in minimally invasive cardiac operations Type Journal Article
  Year 2022 Publication European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Abbreviated Journal Eur J Cardiothorac Surg  
  Volume 61 Issue 6 Pages 1348-1354  
  Keywords *Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects/instrumentation/methods; *Femoral Artery/surgery; Humans; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; *Vascular Closure Devices; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Minimally invasive surgery; Vascular closure devise  
  Abstract OBJECTIVES: Both surgical and percutaneous femoral accesses for the establishment of extracorporeal circulation are used in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries. The goal of this study was to compare the outcomes with the MANTA vascular closure device after percutaneous arterial decannulation via the surgical approach. METHODS: Between November 2018 and January 2021, a total of 490 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive cardiac operations at our institution. Cannulation and decannulation of femoral vessels were under direct vision surgically or percutaneously. The MANTA system was used to close the femoral artery in all patients with percutaneous cannulation. Demographic, clinical and procedural data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Surgical cut-down and suture closure of the femoral artery was performed in 222 patients (45.3%); percutaneous access and closure with the MANTA system was used in 268 patients (54.7%). The surgical group presented a significantly higher incidence of any access site complication compared to the percutaneous group [18 patients (8.1%) vs 6 patients (2.2%); P = 0.003]. Lymph fistula and wound healing disorders occurred more frequently in the surgical group (3.2% vs 0% [P = 0.004] and 3.6% vs 0% [P = 0.002], respectively). Median procedural duration and stays in the intensive care unit were significantly lower in the percutaneous group {127 [interquartile range (IQR) 97-158] min vs 150 (IQR 117-185) min (P < 0.001) and 1 (IQR 1-2) day vs 2 (IQR 1-3) days (P = 0.008), respectively}. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous access and closure with the MANTA system are feasible, safe and associated with lower incidences of all-cause access site complications and shorter stays in the intensive care unit compared to surgical access and closure in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries.  
  Address Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Place of Publication Editor  
  Language English Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN 1010-7940 ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes PMID:35445255 Approved no  
  Call Number AB @ egress_05_spud @ Serial 47195  
Permanent link to this record
Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print

Save Citations:
Export Records: